Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Texas Judge James R. DePiazza Has Bizarre New Wedding Requirement
#7
(07-14-2015, 12:49 PM)fredtoast Wrote: In order for a contract to be binding there has to be consideration given by both sides.  In this case the judge is not giving anything up at all.  He is legally required to marry them even if he does not agree with same sex marriage.

It would be like a store owner saying he will only accept black customers if they agree to certain terms.  That just is not legal.

Oh, I get that he cannot refuse his services.
I was just thinking that if anyone were silly enough to sign the contract, they would be bound.





Messages In This Thread
RE: Texas Judge James R. DePiazza Has Bizarre New Wedding Requirement - Rotobeast - 07-14-2015, 01:00 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)