Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Social media in the 2016 election
#6
(10-18-2016, 07:55 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Bots are one thing, but actual people getting paid to troll and parrot official talking points(Hillary's Correct the Record PAC) is pathetic. They are so easy to spot and they don't have actual arguemnts - just a list of pro-Hillary talking points and some lame insults to hurl at Trump. The fact that people need to get paid to support Hillary is laughable.

Trump has Reddit, /pol and internet trolls in general on his side that do professional work pro bono. Pepes won't post themselves you know.

I don't see how having to inflate your numbers with bots is any better than paying people to do it. Saying one is better than the other would have to come from a position of bias. Both situations are misinformation campaigns.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR





Messages In This Thread
RE: Social media in the 2016 election - Belsnickel - 10-18-2016, 09:15 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)