10-18-2016, 11:26 PM
(10-18-2016, 08:31 PM)6andcounting Wrote: As long as my misconception means you're admitting the NYT's article is "sloppy" and "shitty reporting and the editor should be all over the person who wrote the story." then I call live with the mistake I made.
Actually, you shouldn't be content to live with the mistake. The **** up by the Times serves as a reminder that even the best press is not always reliable, so the goal should be to get as close to the actual source - which you can since the Times has a linked video interview with her - as possible and you should also question all arguments, even those that support your position. You present yourself as the sort of troglodyte who would vote for Trump after you watched him gun down 10 nuns, 10 nursing mothers, 10 Wall Street Bankers, 10 pupppies, and 10 strippers. But in spite of your unassailable devotion to him, your inability to rationally evaluate the attack on the accuser in question (see the "Lefty" post) makes you look (even more) stupid. I rather doubt that is your goal. If you could say, "I would vote for him even after all that carnage, but this is a bull shit argument defending his sexual assault of a human," you would garner more respect.
JOHN ROBERTS: From time to time in the years to come, I hope you will be treated unfairly so that you will come to know the value of justice... I wish you bad luck, again, from time to time so that you will be conscious of the role of chance in life and understand that your success is not completely deserved and that the failure of others is not completely deserved either.
