NYT: Trump assaulted two women

[Rotobeast]

(10-18-2016, 11:26 PM)xxlt Wrote: Actually, you shouldn't be content to live with the mistake. The **** up by the Times serves as a reminder that even the best press is not always reliable, so the goal should be to get as close to the actual source - which you can since the Times has a linked video interview with her - as possible and you should also question all arguments, even those that support your position. You present yourself as the sort of troglodyte who would vote for Trump after you watched him gun down 10 nuns, 10 nursing mothers, 10 Wall Street Bankers, 10 pupppies, and 10 strippers. But in spite of your unassailable devotion to him, your inability to rationally evaluate the attack on the accuser in question (see the "Lefty" post) makes you look (even more) stupid. I rather doubt that is your goal. If you could say, "I would vote for him even after all that carnage, but this is a bull shit argument defending his sexual assault of a human," you would garner more respect.