10-19-2016, 01:35 PM
(10-19-2016, 12:53 PM)3wt Wrote: I like the 2 TE idea as well. And I know he's not as explosive, but I'd use Hewitt and Kroft. Kroft has reliable hands and decent speed and both he and Kroft are good blockers. Hewitt knows where to get open as well. So you have a flexible offense. Combine that with the no huddle and go to town. If the O Line ever jells it could be a good dynamic offense.
Look at what happened when the Patriots went to the 2 TE offense in the 2nd half...
(10-19-2016, 12:57 PM)3wt Wrote: Yeah it's not crazy. I'm not dissing Zamp, but one of Andy's strengths is his ability to diagnose at the LOS and call his own plays.
We start to get moving and we sub players, send in a play and disrupt the flow of the offense. Let Andy call the game from the line with a 2 TE set (with no stupid trick plays) and wear the defense down.
We sure have not seen much of Hewitt for paying him dough in the Offseason. He has better hands than Uzi and
Kroft looked much better against the Pats. I think it would be a good idea to run more of the no huddle with 2 TE
sets and use more TE screens, WR Slant and RB seam routes but i said this last week.
