Wikileaks......still no proof of corruption.

[Dill]

(10-21-2016, 12:10 PM)fredtoast Wrote: A lot has been made of the damage Wikileaks is doing to Hillary, but I still not seen any proof of corruption.  I define "corruption" as taking official action in return for personal gain.  Hillary has served as a U.S. Senator and as Sec of State, but I have not seen any evidence that she gave any preferential treatment to any person or group in exchange  for money.

Am I missing something?

Why goodness yes, Fred. Read a little faster and you'll see what I mean.

"HillarykingofmorrocoClintonFoundation12millionHRCmustcome." 

If you read too carefully you will find yourself wondering "Wait, did money change hands, anything actually happen?" Just go on to the next email, ready that one rapidly too, and soon you will marvel at how Hillary "gets away with it."