Texas Judge James R. DePiazza Has Bizarre New Wedding Requirement

[*bfine32*]

(07-15-2015, 07:50 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Because I assumed you'd shut up if one word was changed in a trivial part of his post. Oh, how I was wrong.



No. As long as he chooses to be in the marriage business, what Fred said stands true.


Question: do you disagree with anything that Fred actually said or are you trying to nit pick because you have nothing else to offer?

Well, I was talking to Fred not to you. You just found it necessary to add your misguided $0.02.

If you look just above you will see that Fred has agreed with me (at least to the best extent that he is capable).

IMO the man is doing nothing discrimitory or illegal. He is offering a service he is not bound to perform; however, he will only do so if anyone wanting his services agrees to sign a contract.

Pointing out the fact that someone changed a post in an effort to prove their erroneous point is not "nit picking". It is calling out a non-forthright poster..