Texas Judge James R. DePiazza Has Bizarre New Wedding Requirement

[BmorePat87]

(07-15-2015, 08:11 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I'm not sure about the liberal part; but I am obviously a great deal more literate.

I can read the OP then read this soapbox rant and realize that the person that wrote this rant did not have the capability to fully understand the OP.

lol, why did you cut the quote off?

Quote:so requiring someone to sign a contract agreeing to conditions in order to get a service he legally has to provide whether or not someone signs the contract makes the contract nonbinding.

I don't have a law degree from Columbia, but according to the source, a law professor from there seems to agree with this. He can choose to not provide them to anyone, but as long as he is in the wedding business, this government official cannot compel you to forgo your rights in order to receive a service he has to provide. The contract won't hold up.