Wikileaks......still no proof of corruption.

[6andcounting]

(10-21-2016, 12:10 PM)fredtoast Wrote: A lot has been made of the damage Wikileaks is doing to Hillary, but I still not seen any proof of corruption. I define "corruption" as taking official action in return for personal gain. Hillary has served as a U.S. Senator and as Sec of State, but I have not seen any evidence that she gave any preferential treatment to any person or group in exchange for money.

Am I missing something?

Your definition of corruption is the actually the definition of "bribery". Bribery is a type of corruption. There is much more to corruption than just bribery.