Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Texas Judge James R. DePiazza Has Bizarre New Wedding Requirement
#41
(07-16-2015, 02:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: To me he is giving those who wish to get married options. He is letting everyone know what he guidelines are prior to requesting his services. He is trying to save folks from being "emotionally raped" when they show up for the service and then they are informed of the guidelines.

How does this hypothetical differ:

I am a swim instructor. Before I agree to instruct anyone desiring my services; they must acknowledge that I am homosexual. I prefer to instruct homosexuals; however, I will instruct anyone that signs this agreement that states that they understand I am homosexual and during the instruction everyone must refrain from any mention of heterosexual activity.
 
 
I might suggest due to certain steps performed during the CPR portion of the lesson, some may feel more comfortable being instructed by those that share their heterosexual preferences.


Have I discriminated against anyone in the above scenario?
Do you always go to absurd hypotheticals to make a point?





Messages In This Thread
RE: Texas Judge James R. DePiazza Has Bizarre New Wedding Requirement - RICHMONDBENGAL_07 - 07-16-2015, 02:38 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)