11-01-2016, 06:22 PM
(11-01-2016, 06:17 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Second paragraph . . .
49+7+11+22=89% not 116%
Open the first link regarding the 49% increase. They did a county by county analysis of increases. They were unable to collect data from 3137 of 3144 counties.
Doesn't sound as cool if they claimed the rate increased by 49% in 7 counties.
So the 49% increase only applies to 7 counties, the 22% is a projection, and I'm not sure where the difference between 89% and 116% came from.
No idea, but I didn't mention the 49% or even the 116% bit.
I just was pointing out the 22% increase coming. Probably could have used a different article, but that's just where I happened to see the 22%. Saw it elsewhere after I knew it was a thing.
____________________________________________________________
![[Image: jamarr-chase.gif]](https://media.tenor.com/Ycw6u-nmw3AAAAAM/jamarr-chase.gif)