Wikileaks......still no proof of corruption.

[JustWinBaby]

(11-03-2016, 07:35 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Only because you are so good at hiding the evidence.

Ummm, no....

You're supposed to be a lawyer...wouldn't being good at hiding the evidence imply people have looked for the evidence?  If I've never even been accused, would a good lawyer suspect it's because I'm merely good at hiding evidence?

So putting on your lawyer hat - is lack of evidence proof of innocence?  And, again, those of us who've never been accused - much less repeatedly with ample circumstantial evidence or not - don't have to "prove" our innocence.

And what is your obsession with little girls and boys? Do you think you're funny? It's ***** disgusting and juvenile at best. You're supposed to be a lawyer, but your responses usually either accuse someone of getting their ideas from an echo chamber, or stalking little girls or boys. Hell, Trump's insults are less pedestrian and sophomoric than yours.