Poll: Who is the one player the Bengals can least afford to lose to injury?
This poll is closed.
Andy Dalton
49.37%
39 49.37%
Jeremy Hill
13.92%
11 13.92%
AJ Green
17.72%
14 17.72%
Andrew Whitworth
2.53%
2 2.53%
Kevin Zeitler
0%
0 0%
Tyler Eifert
1.27%
1 1.27%
Geno Atkins
6.33%
5 6.33%
Carlos Dunlap
1.27%
1 1.27%
Michael Johnson
0%
0 0%
Vontaze Burfict
3.80%
3 3.80%
Leon Hall
0%
0 0%
Rey Maualuga
0%
0 0%
Reggie Nelson
1.27%
1 1.27%
George Iloka
0%
0 0%
Other (state whom)
2.53%
2 2.53%
Total 79 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who is the one player the Bengals can least afford to lose to injury?
#43
(05-15-2015, 09:25 PM)Shepdawg Wrote: No one ever wants to talk about injuries to key players, but they happen each and every year.  That's why teams try to have quality have depth as back up's in key positions.  The Bengals have had a pretty good run of solid drafts, and have pretty good depth at a number of -key positions.  That being said, who do you think the Bengals can LEAST afford to lose for the majority of the season,(more than say 10 games)?

It's Dalton, hands down. However, I was really hoping for depth at the WR position to be addressed with some serious speed to replace the likes of Sanzenbacher, Tate, and Little. I know they drafted Alford, but I was really hoping for someone like Devin Smith.

In other words, if any team loses their starting QB, it is usually game over. I looked at this more from the standpoint of "what did they need the most to prevent another early exit in the playoffs" and that was more talent at WR.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Who is the one player the Bengals can least afford to lose to injury? - SHRacerX - 05-17-2015, 09:59 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)