Question for Anti-Establishment Trump People

[*bfine32*]

(11-14-2016, 06:58 PM)Benton Wrote: I'm not the best at math, but, generally, I view a loss as a loss as a loss. I'm not sure how that's adding anything. I served on a regional board looking at mitigating the loss of FTC jobs. It was better than forecasted, but still a loss. And with Knox, I'm not sure what you're talking about.

http://www.wave3.com/story/3342390/radcliff-community-sorry-fort-knox-will-lose-jobs-but-thankful-its-open


http://www.wlky.com/article/fort-knox-hospital-to-be-downsized-due-to-army-restructuring/3768869


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/06/26/army-post-with-few-fighting-troops-downsizing-means-fort-knox-to-lose-lone.html


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/mar/5/4-schools-at-fort-knox-to-close/


Bizarro Mitch. Kentucky loses jobs, Kentucky voters applaud his work.

Well if you are not sure what I'm talking about in regards to Ft Knox, perhaps you should read your own links as it was mentioned in the first one you posted:

http://www.theleafchronicle.com/story/news/local/fort-campbell/2015/07/09/fort-campbell-reduced-troops/29906307/

Quote:Fort Knox, for example, is expected to gain 67 troops, according to The Courier-Journal.

I was just going off the cuff when I mentioned they weren't losing any (at Campbell), but if you want to point to a realignment that causes a base the size of Ft Campbell to lose 300 folks as an example of Mitch not doing good things for the state then have at it. Just understand you may be on the inside looking out of Bizarro world; instead of the inverse.

Ft Campbell has about 30,000 Active Duty Soldiers and they are losing about 300 (1%) in a climate that is working to drastically downsize. I honesty thought you were giving him praise because to link the article you did as an example of a slight makes zero sense.