11-15-2016, 06:25 PM
Dueling "Chiefs" of Staff is an interesting idea (although I don't know how different their views are, or if Bannon really has any business being in the mix). It's an extra level of vetting and dealing before it gets to Trump for a decision.
The flipside is no one else has thought to try it, or at least seen a need. If you intend for your CoS to be an extention of your agenda, then one makes sense. If you're malleable and looking to get stuff done, then two might be more effective.
We will see. You can also argue it's a more centralized arrangement, and that he wants two people because Trump intends for his interests/agenda to be more represented and part of the process. In other words, his agenda can be in two places at the same time instead of one.
The flipside is no one else has thought to try it, or at least seen a need. If you intend for your CoS to be an extention of your agenda, then one makes sense. If you're malleable and looking to get stuff done, then two might be more effective.
We will see. You can also argue it's a more centralized arrangement, and that he wants two people because Trump intends for his interests/agenda to be more represented and part of the process. In other words, his agenda can be in two places at the same time instead of one.
--------------------------------------------------------
