Accountability?

[treee]

(11-20-2016, 02:01 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Right here it is.



Basically you are claiming that the reason Green criticized the pass protection to the press is because the coaches are not addressing the issue.

This all goes back to my original question.  What form of "accountability" do you think this team needs.  You specifically cited what Green said, and I asked how that helps anything.  Apparently you only feel that speaking to the media helps when the player thinks the coaches are not doing what needs to be done.

So, again, how does Green's "holding his teammates accountable" help this team?  Because I don't see anything in Greens comments that makes me think he feels the coaches are not doing their jobs.  Instead i think he is just stating a fact.  I don't think stating a simple fact amounts to "holding players accountable", and I don't see how it will improve the team.

Almost everythread has a comment about "no accountability".  But now that you have started a thread on the subject it seems like you don't want to actually discuss the issue because as soon as I asked a question (instead of just 100% agreeing with you) you get all bent out of shape.  

Fun fact for everyone out there, when someone prefaces their account of your words with "Basically", it is a huge red flag that they might be distorting what you said.

To directly address your chain of logic, I have a couple of issues with you supposition. First you are assuming that I think that Green made those comments because he does not think the proper changes are being made. Those are two unrelated statements that you're stringing together to make a weak argument. Secondly, since you're going to get into semantics, I would hardly classify "they have to give him more time" as throwing them under the bus. 

Basically you're using incorrect assumptions and lumping together unrelated statements to create an argument against me because apparently you don't know how to think in any other terms than lawyer.

Edit: Also I'd like to point out another facet of error in your assumption. You took my statement that players can voice discontent to the press as a method to pressure for change in a manner which would imply that it is the only reason for a player to speak to the press about the performance of their teammates.