07-18-2015, 07:49 PM
(07-18-2015, 06:01 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: When it comes to these EPA regulations, it cost people jobs, consumers pay more for services.
As far as impact on the global climate scene; What are other industrialized Nations doing? If only the US penalizes companies, and forces its citizens to use more expensive energy sources, doesn't that really impact the economy in a negative way, while only making just a drop in the global "bucket" of pollution?
None of these are valid excuses to allow special interest groups to manipulate data, which is what would happen.
(07-18-2015, 06:42 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: I'm ok with then opening their books. I wanna see it all. If it's a real thing then they would have no problem showing their work.
EPA regulations should be based on scientific findings that are peer reviewed. And most of them are. The problem is that some people that don't necessarily understand the scientific method or how to interpret the data don't like the findings and so rely on a minority of people that do have credentials in a vaguely related field (or one that just sounds similar) to present some contrary evidence for a straw man attack.
