Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Presidential Conflicts of Interest
#39
(11-22-2016, 01:05 AM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: I did see it on a website, a former SS agent was talking about how Trump Towers might not fly with the SS, but Mar A Lago would be Trumps best option. Something like 59 rooms, not including Trump's living space. Trump would love this, cause them he could give the middle finger to the Palm Beach council for the SS making it a no fly zone. He's been fighting that fight for years.

They had planned to initially start the renovations during Obama's last year, but he told them to save it for the next POTUS. I'm surprised Obama didn't agree as it was the perfect excuse for him to get more golfing done on our dime.

And it irritates the hell out me because the last 2 times the Democrats have left the White House it was not a smooth transistion for the incoming Republican POTUS. The Clintons vandalized and stole stuff from the White House and it cost taxpayers over 1 million to clean up their shit.

Jimmy Carter forget to take Billy with him?

Edit:

http://www.salon.com/2001/05/23/vandals/

Quote:The “scandal” broke benignly enough, with an item in Lloyd Grove’s dishy Reliable Source column in the Jan. 23 Washington Post, three days after the inauguration of George W. Bush.

“Incoming staffers of the Bush White House,” Grove wrote, were “apparently victims of a practical joke.” Bush aides in the Old Executive Office Building (EOB), adjacent to the White House, discovered that “many computer keyboards in their work spaces are missing the W key — as in President Bush’s middle initial.”

Some W keys were discovered “taped on top of the doorways,” while others were broken.

The report was more cute than cutting, with Grove quoting former Al Gore spokesman Chris Lehane, who quipped: “I think the missing W’s can be explained by the vast left-wing conspiracy now at work.”

But within two days, Grove’s playful item had morphed into one more full-blown Clinton scandal. Suddenly newspapers and TV news shows were featuring extensive reports of Clinton administration “vandalism,” stretching from the EOB offices of former Vice President Gore to the West Wing. Reports alleged expletive-ridden graffiti, sliced computer and telephone wires, file cabinets glued shut, presidential seals steamed off doors, stolen pictures and so-called porn bombs, which were never exactly described.

VideoDonald Trump and The Precedent of Japanese Internment Camps
The technological problems the vandals wrought were so severe that, according to a report in the New York Daily News, “a telecommunications staffer with more than a quarter-century of service was seen sobbing.”

“Phone lines cut, drawers filled with glue, door locks jimmied so that arriving Bush staff got locked inside their new offices,” a disapproving Andrea Mitchell reported on NBC News. The message seemed clear: The trailer-trash Clintons and their staff had enjoyed one last bacchanal at taxpayer expense.

Now it seems those closely detailed stories were largely bunk. Last week it was revealed that a formal review by the General Accounting Office, Congress’ investigative agency, “had found no damage to the offices of the White House’s East or West Wings or EOB” and that Bush’s own representatives had reported “there is no record of damage that may have been deliberately caused by the employees of the Clinton administration.”

While cautious GSA staffers won’t issue a blanket exoneration of the Clinton team, Bernard Ungar, the agency’s director of physical infrastructure, told Salon the media clearly exaggerated the extent of the damage. According to the terse GSA statement that formed the basis of Ungar’s conclusion, “the condition of the real property was consistent with what we would expect to encounter when tenants vacate office space after an extended occupancy.”

Rep. Bob Barr, R-Ga., the ardent Clinton foe who requested the GAO review, has tried to interpret the agency’s findings to mean no “record of damage” had been compiled, not that no damage had occurred. But the lack of records “cataloging” any damages — which Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer promised in January the White House would compile — would seem to suggest one thing: Widespread acts of vandalism never occurred.

More at the link.
[Image: giphy.gif]
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.





Messages In This Thread
RE: Presidential Conflicts of Interest - GMDino - 11-22-2016, 08:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)