Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Peerman gets activated not WJ3
(11-23-2016, 03:23 PM)BengalsRocker Wrote: Why couldn't they have brought back WJIII and cut Chykie then signed a RB or brought one up from PS?

Do we even have a PS running back?

I'm mobile and haven't been keeping up with the PS roster.

It just seems to me that a back up RB would be easier to scrape up than a CB would might contribute if for some reason they compete for post season.

Fair point, but you know how the Bengals operate. They are going to be loyal to Peerman...Even if he's 30 years old coming off injury. Signing Hillman and bringing WJIII off of IR would've been a better move. 

But if I'm forced to choose strictly between Peerman and WJIII, I think it's obvious you need 3 RBs.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:31 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 01:58 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:14 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:25 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:38 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-24-2016, 07:50 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:59 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 04:10 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - snowy - 11-23-2016, 01:48 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:47 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 01:19 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Shake n Blake - 11-24-2016, 02:22 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-24-2016, 07:54 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - treee - 11-28-2016, 09:18 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)