12-09-2016, 01:06 PM
(12-09-2016, 12:48 PM)bfine32 Wrote: ...and this is not a new stance on my part (see that is truely middle-ground). Although I hate the idea of abortion and think history will judge us on it; I understand the reality.
But if the father wants the child and can show he has the means to provide for it, then he shouldbe allowed to be a father.
EDIT: History has shown me that I must include this disclaimer (because folks are silly): If the pregnancy is the result of crime or incest, risks the mother's health (other that otherwise pregnant), or the baby; then the father's right is revolked.
If the father could become a father without forcing the mother to do something with her body against her wishes (carry a pregnancy to term and give birth) then you, I, and the Supreme Court would all be in agreement.