12-09-2016, 07:03 PM
(12-09-2016, 03:22 PM)bfine32 Wrote: As to the Supreme Court we will see how that plays out in the future, but if they change; I assume you will admit my stance is correct.
He didn't force her against her will to participate in the activity that can lead to life.
I've always found the assertion that the woman has the say simply because of her sex to be discriminatory; but, perhaps you are more open to "middle ground" than I.
That is at best, a gross misunderstanding of the Supreme Court's ruling. Or a deliberate misrepresentation. It is not a question of sex discrimination, it is a question of undue burden.
