Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is Dennard playing better?
#17
(12-10-2016, 08:18 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: You put that much stock in forty times eh?

I don't.

Fast on the field is what matters and Dennard does not look slow out there.

Who says I put that much stock in 40 times? It is a nice reference, though. Dennard looks too slow to cover fast WRs to my eyes, and his 40 time just reinforces that. If there was zero point to it, they wouldn't have it.

When I see him in coverage on someone who runs deep, he is normally well behind them. Some players play faster than their 40, Dennard doesn't seem to be one of them.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: jamarr-chase.gif]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Is Dennard playing better? - bengals67 - 12-09-2016, 03:59 PM
RE: Is Dennard playing better? - Jpoore - 12-09-2016, 04:11 PM
RE: Is Dennard playing better? - Jpoore - 12-09-2016, 05:15 PM
RE: Is Dennard playing better? - XenoMorph - 12-09-2016, 05:19 PM
RE: Is Dennard playing better? - Jpoore - 12-09-2016, 05:47 PM
RE: Is Dennard playing better? - Crowe - 12-09-2016, 05:15 PM
RE: Is Dennard playing better? - lostpoet2 - 12-09-2016, 06:34 PM
RE: Is Dennard playing better? - lostpoet2 - 12-09-2016, 06:59 PM
RE: Is Dennard playing better? - TheLeonardLeap - 12-10-2016, 11:47 PM
RE: Is Dennard playing better? - jj22 - 12-10-2016, 09:26 PM
RE: Is Dennard playing better? - jason - 12-10-2016, 09:47 PM
RE: Is Dennard playing better? - Sled21 - 12-11-2016, 11:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)