07-21-2015, 02:51 PM
(07-21-2015, 07:46 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: First, it doesn't need to be genetic for it to not be a choice. Second, I'm not sure why we're so focused on a gay gene, anyway. Wouldn't there have to be a genetic sequence that would mark us as straight )if it was genetics) as well? A difference in the base pairs would be the cause of a different sexual attraction, right?
Anyway, not likely it is genetic given the sliding scale of it all. People really need to stop arguing all of that.
Being made to be attracted to the opposite sex would be natural since its a survival mechanism. Without that humans would be extinct or close to extinction. We are made to survive. Survival is creating more humans... That's the way mother nature works in any animal. Survivability. So if we are born premade to survive then being gay, which is the opposite of human survival, would be a side effect under certain amount of mental and emotional distress.
