I Have Been Saying

[*bfine32*]

(12-16-2016, 03:02 AM)hollodero Wrote: That is so confusing.
First off, the woman gets the child, so she has the power in principle and men need to accept that or else they look just foolish. I guess really no one is disputing the differences between the sexes here, as no one disputes other ones like women have breasts and men are stronger and other biological givens.
It's a bit pointless to create laws against this "unfairness" or whatever you call it. It would make no sense to give 50% of jobs that require physical strength to women, nor would a mixed football team make sense, that is just as obvious as the womb thing. It's HER body and you just get no say there, that's just nature's work.
So is it unfair to men? If you want to look at it that way, then it might be. Here's your first solution as a man: Use contraception. Plan in advance your procreation, pick the right woman that is on board. Just be responsible about that. If you just have an affair with an "screw condoms but not with them" attitude it's your own fault when you "handed power over to the women" or whatnot because you just were too careless and now she's pregnant (SHE, not BOTH OF YOU). Therefore I have problems to be too sympathetic here. You don't get to have unprotected sex and then demand a woman to keep the child if you somehow figured "ok, child, actually cool" - or refuse to care for it if you don't feel like acting like a resposible person.
SHE can choose. YOU can't. Really that's the end of the story, complaints about that are to be directed directly to God. As for child support, I never heard a women doesn't need to support her offspring and only men do. Really don't know what you mean there.

Oh, and for the confusing part. What is your suggestion here.
The way I see it, a pregnancy opens two possibilities:
a) Father and Mother agree on what happens next or b) they don't.

Now in case b) what to do? Democracy obviously is not an option. So you are left with either a) go with what the woman wants OR b) go with what the man wants. I do not really see middle ground here. Hence, all the more option a), because, again, she is the baby carrying one out of the two. That seems to make... sense?

Man, this confusion is contegious. A woman can voluntarily abort a child and free herself from supporting the child; the man cannot.

What about biological make up makes sense that the woman is the only one that can voluntarily choose not to support the child? Why can't the man freely say: "I don't want anything to do with this child."