I Have Been Saying

[*bfine32*]

(12-16-2016, 04:57 PM)hollodero Wrote: Well, that's just the way it is, that's why. Complaints to God.

I don't really grasp the stance. You want the man to have the choice to just abandon his new-born child? As an "equivalent" to the women having the right to terminate the pregnancy? That your point?

Nope I want every child to be wanted, loved, and cared for.. No one should be able to abandon a newborn child; I think everyone would agree to that. However, if the woman can walk away during pregnancy, why can't the man? There is nothing fair about the woman having complete say if neither or both get the child.

If the man wants it and can support it; he should be allowed to

If the woman wants it and she or the government can support it; she should be allowed to

If the woman wants no part of it she should have that choice

If the man wants no part of it, he should have that choice.

Why is it fair to say the government cannot have say over the woman's welfare, but it can over the man's? (I mean besides ther profound "That's just the way it is")