I Have Been Saying

[*bfine32*]

(12-16-2016, 06:07 PM)hollodero Wrote: I hope so...!


OK so what's the suggestion. The woman wants to terminate pregnancy, but the man wants the child. So she doesn't get to terminate the pregnancy, has to give birth and he takes complete care for the child afterwards? Is that your suggestion.
Nope, woman carries it to term, provided there are no medical complications, delivers the child, and forfeits all right and responsibilities. Just like an adoption.

Now for the last part... that means a woman gets pregnant, doesn't want to terminate the pregnancy, so the man gets to say: I don't want have to do anyting with that child, including any financial support?
That means government has to help out because the man simply chose not to participate financially (and we all agree the child should be supported, see your first sentence)? That your suggestion?
Yes, if the law is going to be fair, the father should be able to walk away from all obligation just as the mother can. I don't want either to happen, but we should at least be fair, right?

I know it's profound and that you meant profane. I also think it's unfair only women have the breasts. Whenever they want to touch some, they simply need to feel themselves up. When I want, I have to do the whole dance, dinner invits and flirtation and being funnier and more ingenious than I actually am so that maybe I have a slight chance. I think that's unfair.
Then again, as profane as it seems, they have the breasts, they have the womb, that's why we behave socially and as a society the way we do. It's not fair because nature ain't "fair".

Nope, I meant profound "showing great insight", I just might not have been serious. Sorta like saying your last paragraph is profound.