07-22-2015, 11:24 AM
(07-22-2015, 11:16 AM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: And because of that, I refute the notion of him being "unarmed"
Behind the wheel of a 2-ton bullet while intoxicated seems pretty armed to me....
Did he have a gun? No. But was he in a situation where he couldn't have caused harm to those around him? Absolutely not
WARNING: HYPERBOLE AHEAD
True, drunk drivers are more likely to kill you than a terrorist BUT doesn't this open the door for drunk drivers to be shot before they can potentially kill anyone? I realize I'm intentionally slippery-ing up a slope here, but if I open fire on a guy who insists he is "Cool to drive" and then use his blood toxicology report along with statistics on drunk-driving homicides to back up my case that I was defending society from someone who could very well injure or kill innocents I wouldn't trust a jury to find me not guilty.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)