And the great admission tour continues..

[Dill]

(12-20-2016, 06:58 PM)bfine32 Wrote: First of all we must understand who introduced violence into this thread and who tried to make a  witty"biased' remark about such violence. 

Secondly, just feeling threatened IMO absolutely pales in comparison to someone actually having acts of violence committed toward them. It's your choice if you view that opinion as dismissive.

Finally any rational person can plainly see the stark difference in these reported acts of violence. One occurs when people are simply going to support their candidate and the second occurs when folks go to a place, at which, their only reason for being present is to agitate and often times conduct acts of violence (throwing objects) themselves. Apparently, you do not see the difference; perhaps because you are so blinded by your hate of the results of the National Election. There once was a time you were one of the more open-minded posters in this forum; however, lately, you have made Dino seem insightful and unbiased. 

What was "biased " about my remark? Are you saying that Hillary did express a desire to punch people, call the press scum, etc.
Why is it "biased" to suggest Hillary did not do that?

I don't think having someone break into your home and write "Trump" and the n word all over you walls necessary pales to a kick or a punch. May depend on the person.  Sometimes people leave their home state just because of such threats. Black people were kept from the polls during segregation years by threats. Threats based upon religious, racial and ethnic differences are to be taken seriously.

And finally, any rational person can see that people are allowed to protest at Trump rallies. They are exercising their freedom of speech.  It is their constitutional right to be present to agitate. Trumpsters have that right too. Neither side has a right to do violence to the other for protesting.