What college PLAYMAKER do you want the most?

[BobJones4980]

(12-20-2016, 05:58 PM)seahawkscheat Wrote: I can't see the logic taking a receiver in the 1st again. packers seahawks patriots cheifs don't have a true number 1 go to receiver and even a team like the cowboys dez bryant misses some games their fine. lions are fine without megatron

Most of those teams you listed have elite or borderline elite QBs outside of maybe KC.

Also If you really think the Packers don't have a #1 or are fine without Jordy then you must have missed last year when they lost Jordy and the offense looked pretty awful.

Another thing to think about is that Gronk is basically a WR and an elite one at that.

Also look at teams like Pitt, GB, Pats or Denver, they have or had Brown and Bryant, Jordy Nelson, Cobb and Adams, Gronk and Hernadez, D. Thomas and Sanders with a competent Manning and even being productive with Brock Lobster at QB. Just because some teams don't do it doesn't mean it can't or shouldn't be done. Hell look at the recent drafts, free agencies and waiver wire pickups of those teams you listed :

Seahawks : Traded for Graham and constantly drafting WR's early.

Patriots : Gronk and always looking for TE/WR's in Free Agency (Moss and recently Floyd to name a few)

Packers : Have multiple WR threats with Nelson, Cobb, and Adams

Lions : Have signed Tate and MJ. 

Only team you listed that doesn't have atleast 2 good options or are constantly looking are the Chiefs because they have a really good running attack that they build the offense around but this team did go out and sign Maclin a couple years back. 

Point is most of the teams you listed DO have a number one option(Gronk and Nelson), have 2 really good options(Lions) or are constantly looking for options to improve(Seahawks). These teams still constantly look to improve whether that is finding more options after there #1 or trying to find that #1 and if we can have an elite group of WR's like Pitt does with Brown or Bryant you have to atleast think about it.