12-24-2016, 01:18 AM
(12-24-2016, 01:02 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Indeed. But the point was to show how astonishingly the claim of AGT is and to ask why you aren't naturally more skeptical of the claims made. That point was lost on you, because you've suspended the most remote of healthy skepticism that those questions should have slapped you in the face with.
Lead a horse to water and all that but...
Lead a horse to water? With what? All those studies you won't cite?
