Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Two Marvin views. Which do you prefer?
#1
Basically there are only schools of though that I have heard and here they are:

A) Keep Marvin.

The Bengals may not have a real legacy under Marvin, but he is competitive. Getting rid of him is too risky. The Bengals may never compete for a superbowl under Marvin, but remember how it was 15 years ago? He's better than Dave Shula or Bruce Coslet. His over all record is a few games over .500. Good enough is good enough. Don't risk it. Plus, Ken Broo loves him.

B) Fire Marvin

Marvin has lost seven playoff games. He was out coached in every one of those losses. Pittsburgh is lauging at us. They can't believe their good fortune. They have played Marvin 30 times and whipped his butt 22 of them and the Bengals are STILL considering keeping him!!! Marvin will entertain us by having a record that is a little over .500. That's not enough. We want more. We want a team that does not meltdown in big games. We want a team that does not squander talent. We want a superbowl not just a few division titles. That will never happen under Marvin.

Whats your choice A or B?
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Two Marvin views. Which do you prefer? - Antares - 12-26-2016, 08:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)