12-29-2016, 10:51 PM
(12-29-2016, 09:27 PM)THE Bigzoman Wrote: You don't seem to get how analogies work. Google's situation isn't comparable to that of any restaurant, so your analogy is ass. That's all I was trying to say. That doesn't carry the implication that any large diversified company can have a shitty product. Not even close.
Because again, google is different from a restaurant in industry, size, power, and scope.
Jesus H. Christ.
http://literarydevices.net/analogy/
Quote:An analogy is a comparison in which an idea or a thing is compared to another thing that is quite different from it. It aims at explaining that idea or thing by comparing it to something that is familiar.
Explaining the definition of an analogy is really outside of the scope of this discussion. You obviously understood the analogy otherwise you wouldn't have responded with market shares and diversification. So you're feigning ignorance in an attempt to make me look ignorant. You should add that to your list of ironies.
Restaurants provide food. Search engines provide search results. Restaurants and Google are businesses that provide a service to customers in order to make money. You understand no matter how much you feign otherwise.
