01-03-2017, 04:49 AM
(01-03-2017, 02:39 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: It's not misguided. If no one is harmed, if there is no overt action, then it's simply bigotry or bias not acted on. Not sure why that is such a difficult concept for you to grasp. It was also explained to you that I wasn't referring only to physical harm.
And, yeah, shouting down debate with malicious and false accusations of racism can be pretty harmful. And false accusations actually are harmful to the people you would intend to protect.
That means if I hate you for no other reason than the color of your skin, but I don't act on my hatred of your skin color I'm a bigot, not a racist. LMFAO!
(01-02-2017, 05:22 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: This is getting ridiculous.
There are racists and people who are simply ignorant. That's not news. Nor is it news that the left parades these anecdotal stories as proof that "most of the hate is racist". It is, again, a meme manufactured to protect and shield Obama from criticism (which seems a pretty racist thing to do, to me).
You're claiming a meme of a chimpanzee labeled as Obama's baby picture was created to protect him from criticism. That's ridiculous. You're also claiming the person who posted the meme was trying to protect Obama. That's ridiculous. And you're claiming using a chimp meme to protect Obama is racist. A hat trick of ridiculous bullshit.
Who was harmed by false accusations of racism by posting a meme of a chimpanzee labeled as Obama's baby picture?
The truly ridiculous part of this is you're claim it is racist to create and use a picture of a chimpanzee to protect Obama from criticism rather than a picture of a chimpanzee used to mock Obama's appearance. Do you really expect me to believe you are so naive you are completely unaware of the historical significance of comparing black people to chimpanzees, monkeys, apes, etcetera?
