Mccarron

[Jpoore]

(01-05-2017, 07:19 PM)Brownshoe Wrote: That's a big excuse. Dalton was having a MVP season in the scheme we were running in 2015, but McCarron came in and looked bad. Garroppolo had the same amount of NFL play time as McCarron too, and he averaged 2 TDs a game 250 yards a game, and 0 TOs (turn overs) a game. McCarron averaged 200 yards a game 1.5 TDs a game and .75 TOs a game. Plus McCarron had horrible pocket presence allowing an average of 3 sacks a game when Dalton was barley even getting hit. Garoppolo looked calm in the pocket.

after he was thrown into that steelers game he didn't have a turnover. plus garrapalo had months to get ready McCarron had weeks. and McCarron is like a alex smith not a deep ball qb, more of a dink and dunk qb. the problem is andy Dalton in 2015 was slinging the ball all over the field and with McCarron u need to run a lot of shorter routes. they didn't realize that.

(01-05-2017, 08:48 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: I didn't claim it was out of the question. I wrote you're the only one who has claimed an unnamed NFL source claimed the Browns discussed trading their second 1st round pick and a 4th for McCarron, but literally no one has reported that, but you.

If McCarron isn't a top 12 player in this draft, why would a team trade a top 12 pick for a QB of lesser value?

Let me quote you . . .

obviously this is all about if a team is gonna reach for a qb ala bears, broncos, jets, bills, browns, jags, etc. if your gonna reach for a qb in this draft there are many better options ala garrapolo, McCarron, etc.