01-12-2017, 07:31 PM
(01-11-2017, 07:54 AM)GMDino Wrote: You're just bringing this on yourself.
The climate studies you claimed to have read and never produced is just going to keep biting you in the arse when you demand others provide proof and youdon't even share a link.
A study won't "prove" Global Warming doesn't exist - you don't prove a negative. Can you not understand that's not how it works? Provide a study you think is good, that supports the case, and we can discuss.
You guys are all so well read and versed on the subject I expected you had good studies at your finger tips. Because I haven't found any. The constant revising lower of past temperatures, changing models, adding and subtracting factors - and you'll find this pretty readily acknowledged, it's no secret. But that's not consistent with good, settled science.
Let's start with the IPCC. Can you tell me how they arrived at their 95% confidence interval? Then next can you show me a climate model predicting catastrophic warming that's actually demonstrated out of sample power? Their models are bad, and so what does that say about conclusions based on those models?
--------------------------------------------------------
