01-12-2017, 10:17 PM
(01-12-2017, 08:50 PM)GMDino Wrote: But isn't that what you said? That you read studies proving it was false?
Nope. I said I've not seen good research that supports the claim of catastophic global warming. Again, you can't conduct a study that proves global warming isn't happening. The hypothesis you're seeking to prove isn't that man IS NOT causing warming, but rather that he is.
Again, CO2 is known greenhouse gas with known properties, and no one really questions man is responsible for the increase. I don't think there's even a single practical alternative theory. But catastrophic warming is not based on CO2 alone, but rather as a catalyst for a bunch of other stuff that's not well understood to magnify it. That's where the empirical data and research start to fall apart.
Every time reality fails to align with their forecasts, they go back and revise data and backfit their models again...and again...and again. If that gives you confidence in their doomsday predictions then there really is no arguing with you. In other fields they call that data mining to fit a pre-determined conclusion.
--------------------------------------------------------
