07-25-2015, 05:02 AM
(07-24-2015, 11:00 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No it isn't leaving economic issues aside. It is directly related to economic issues.
No one is forcing these women to get abortions. They decide to get them because it is more of a benefit to them than a damage. This has nothing to do with eugenics.
I am not goinjg to keep saying the same thing oiver and over again. This game is getting boring.
First off you read it wrong. Regardless of the economic issue (will get to that shortly) the actual effect is more blacks and Hispanic babies being killed.
Now you keep asserting this is an economic advantage for these women. This is exactly from the negro project. You keep preaching the same eugenics nonsense of Sanger, Malthus, and Ernst. Don't you find it odd that your using the same reasoning as Eugenicists were using back in the day? I don't think deep down your a Eugenicist.... But I do think you have allowed their nonsense to penetrate your thinking and its clouded your judgement on matters such as these...
Yeah there is no gun to anyones head to get an abortion. Your right about that.... But they are told from a very early age that it's ok to have an abortion for financial reasons, personal reasons, whatever...
Instead of telling them that they are taking away a life. They tell them things like its a lump of cells. ... Which coincidently they are selling off to the highest bidder.
Quote: she argued that birth control clinics, or bureaus, should be established in which men and women will be taught the science of parenthood and the science of breeding. For this was the way to breed out of the race the scourges of transmissible disease, mental defect, poverty, lawlessness, crime … since these classes would be decreasing in number instead of breeding like weeds [emphasis added].16
Her program called for women to receive birth control advice in various situations, including where:
the woman or man had a transmissible disease such as insanity, feeble-mindedness, epilepsy, syphilis, etc.;
the children already born were subnormal or feeble-minded;
the father’s wages were inadequate … to provide for more children.
Sanger said such a plan would … reduce the birthrate among the diseased, the sickly, the poverty stricken and anti-social classes, elements unable to provide for themselves, and the burden of which we are all forced to carry.
Quote: Many Americansblack and whiteare unaware of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger’s Negro Project. Sanger created this program in 1939, after the organization changed its name from the American Birth Control League (ABCL) to the Birth Control Federation of America (BCFA).1
The aim of the program was to restrictmany believe exterminatethe black population. Under the pretense of better health and family planning, Sanger cleverly implemented her plan. What’s more shocking is Sanger’s beguilement of black America’s crème de la crèmethose prominent, well educated and well-to-dointo executing her scheme. Some within the black elite saw birth control as a means to attain economic empowerment,elevate the race and garner the respect of whites.
The Negro Project has had lasting repercussions in the black community: We have become victims of genocide by our own hands, cried Hunter at the Say So march.
Malthusian Eugenics
IntroductionMalthusian EugenicsThe Harlem ClinicBirth Control as a SolutionWeb of DeceitBetter Health for 13,000,000Scientific RacismSanger’s LegacyUntangling the Deceptive WebEnd Notes
Margaret Sanger aligned herself with the eugenicists whose ideology prevailed in the early 20th century. Eugenicists strongly espoused racial supremacy and purity, particularly of the Aryan race. Eugenicists hoped to purify the bloodlines and improve the race by encouraging the fit to reproduce and the unfit to restrict their reproduction. They sought to contain the inferior races through segregation, sterilization, birth control and abortion.
Sanger embraced Malthusian eugenics. Thomas Robert Malthus, a 19th-century cleric and professor of political economy, believed a population time bomb threatened the existence of the human race.2 He viewed social problems such as poverty, deprivation and hunger as evidence of this population crisis. According to writer George Grant, Malthus condemned charities and other forms of benevolence, because he believed they only exacerbated the problems. His answer was to restrict population growth of certain groups of people.3 His theories of population growth and economic stability became the basis for national and international social policy. Grant quotes from Malthus’ magnum opus, An Essay on the Principle of Population, published in six editions from 1798 to 1826:
All children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room is made for them by the deaths of grown persons. We should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality.4
Malthus’ disciples believed if Western civilization were to survive, the physically unfit, the materially poor, the spiritually diseased, the racially inferior, and the mentally incompetent had to be suppressed and isolatedor even, perhaps, eliminated. His disciples felt the subtler and more scientific approaches of education, contraception, sterilizationand abortion were more practical and acceptable ways to ease the pressures of the alleged overpopulation.
