01-26-2017, 11:17 PM
(01-26-2017, 08:38 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Dang you ask a lot of questions when one gets answered but I will try:
Snark.
Quote:I don't know the numbers of Americans threatened by Saddam Hussan, but I'll put it at a few
More snark.
Quote:Their leader committing crimes against humanity,
True.
Quote:we are not responsible for the increased extremism
Completely false. The Army's own intel reports indicate Saddam was not providing safe haven to Al-Qaeda as we alleged and that Al-Qaeda in Iraq (not to be confused with the larger umbrella organization, Al-Qaeda) was the result of our invasion of Iraq.
Quote:Saddam Hussan invited us with his repeated crimes;
There are other countries which commit(ted) crimes against humanity, but we didn't invaded them. Rwanda, for instance. Why haven't we invaded Rwanda to stop the crimes against humanity committed there? Because our national security isn't threatened by the war crimes commited in Rwanda.
Quote:I'm not sure they actually have an invitation committee
More snark.
Quote:I'm not sure if you are talking about Desert Storm or Iraqi Freedom when asking why did we stop; you're kind of inter-mingling them here
Finally, a valid point which isn't a snarky comment or completely false.
Quote:We don't invade all countries because sanctions are perhaps more effective on poorer countries
At best, this comment is merely disingenuous (and I hate that god damn word, but I'm forced to use it in this case.)
Quote:I think I got them all.
The snarky cherry on top is a nice touch.
