02-02-2017, 12:28 PM
(02-02-2017, 11:28 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I don't want to outright dismiss anything... but you're posting youtube videos and random message boards. It is one of the dumbest conspiracy theories I have ever read about.
Seriously, though, why the **** hire an out of work actor to stage an attack to destroy a computer and deal with the publicity and legal issues when you could just take a drill and destroy a hard drive more efficiently and quietly? People try so hard to draw connections between things that they convince themselves that it has to be more than a coincidence when in reality it's a bizarre stretch. Seriously, lol, they hired a dude to destroy the computer?
You can believe what you want to believe, but public opinion of CPP skyrocketed after the shooting incident. It became all too easy to classify an entire group of citizen investigators and curious people as "alt right lunatics"(I'm not alt right btw. I'm leftist as shit). Stranger things have happened - just look at what the FBI did to MLK, or the USS Liberty for instance. Even if the shooter(who just signed an undisclosed plea deal https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/us-prosecutors-offer-unspecified-plea-deal-in-comet-ping-pong-pizza-case/2017/01/24/db300f2a-e245-11e6-ba11-63c4b4fb5a63_story.html?utm_term=.a94218c0d7ef) had nothing to do with it and was just a kook, there is a veritable mountain of circumstantial evidence to suggest that there is something extremely fishy going on with Alefantis and Podesta.
These "random message boards" happen to have a trove of primary evidence that was not just pulled out of thin air - the stuff came from leaked emails(who no one is disputing the accuracy of), instagram posts from the people who may be involved, videos from the venue, restaurant reviews, pictures from social media, archived photos, suggestive art displayed in people's homes, and much more. This is what a citizen investigation looks like. I'd urge you to spend an hour or two taking a look at the primary evidence and ask yourself: why didn't the major news outlets just discuss the primary evidence? Why did they misrepresent the entire investigation by classifying all of the investigators as "alt right conspiracy theorists?" Why did they misrepresent the theory as being some bizarre concoction that I've never heard a PG investigator speak of, such as "Hillary Clinton was running a child prostitution ring out of a pizza shop?"
Also, if you don't believe that this sort of thing can be covered up, ask yourself why former Vietnam war veteran and Nebraska State Senator, John Decamp, would write a book titled, "The Franklin Coverup." He must have been onto something due to calling out Sandusky as being a conspirator years before Penn State broke, right?
