02-08-2017, 12:58 PM
(02-08-2017, 04:26 AM)Rotobeast Wrote: I'm curious as to what you meant, about the two dozen that do the same thing statement ?
Also....
He probably didn't have anything taken away.
A. He's not dumb enough to tell everyone what he's got.
B. He's a LEO.
C. He lost every firearm he owned in a tragic boating accident.
Actually, I can buy handguns that are "off roster". The handguns available to CA residents are very limited and the list shrinks every year. It's backdoor banning and people like GMDino like to pretend it isn't but then act aghast when gun owners don't trust word one from the mouths of anti-firearms politicians and activists.
(02-08-2017, 10:37 AM)GMDino Wrote: Let's say he owns the guns that he can't buy anymore.
He still owns them even after the law was passed. They didn't come and "take his guns".
He can buy lots of other guns. He can't buy that one.
I don't want to know what he has. None of my business.
If he lost all his guns he can but almost all them again...just not one.
Unless it's some special Mexican Ghost Voter killing gun it's just another gun.
And, again, I don't even care if people CAN buy the gun. I'm just saying no one "took his guns".
Until he dies. Then this ONE type has to be disabled or turned into the state. I'm still not sure how that is "taking his guns".
But I know a lot of people think a lot of their guns.
Chortle, "one type". Incorrect, a huge category of firearms, not to mention the absurd handgun roster that, as mentioned above, gets smaller every year.
Yet, I'm curious, you said there's no confiscation, what about magazines that hold more than 10 rounds? Those are being "taken away". Why do you ignore that undeniable fact? The government is taking away people's legally purchased property and this doesn't bother you? The failure of said people to turn in their legally purchased property turns a law abiding citizen into a criminal and this doesn't bother you? All, btw, while CA reduces sentences for child sex traffickers and other odious convicted criminals. When the state is more concerned with citizens that have never been convicted of a crime than those that have committed felonies something is very wrong and something is very wrong with anyone who can't see that.
