And now we know the underlying reason..

[GMDino]

(02-12-2017, 10:08 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Thanks Beaker, that information is very interesting.  I'll be sure to read more about the stomata analysis.



What do you think a "whistle blower" is?  Obviously, he wants to point out that the information being used, has been manipulated to show something in a different light that it actually was.  Duh...

Nope. re-read it.

Quote:The record data that Bates takes umbrage with showed roughly the same amount of warming as the old record. And the evidence that the Karl paper cites as to why there’s no hiatus is based on ocean temperatures—not land. A government source who does not wish to be named emphasized that there is no evidence or even a credible suggestion that NOAA falsified data in the Karl et al (K15) study. And even if Bates' critiques were valid—and given that this methodology, after much peer review, is now the default way that NOAA calculates land temperatures, his complaints seem problematic—it doesn't upend the study's conclusion.