Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Move on from Whitworth if it means keeping Zeitler
#62
(02-13-2017, 01:47 PM)muskiesfan Wrote: I understand people want to point to Whitworth's age, but if we can only keep 1 of the 2, I want it to be Whitworth. It's nice knowing Andy's blindside is protected. While we all know that the Bengals can certainly afford to retain all of the big 3, they won't. The way it's looking, I'd almost be willing to bet they only keep 1 of the 3.

For some reason this team doesn't value interior line play and is fine with a below average running game. Yet, the coaching staff always wants to "Play AFC North Football" and try to cram it down other teams throats. It makes no goddamn sense. Since your #1 goal in a passing league is to run the ball, why wouldn't you value the pieces that will help you do that? The Bengals are the dumbest franchise in the entire NFL.

For me, it doesn't make sense because you drafted him in the first round. If RG is not that valuable, then why did you draft him in the first freaking round? If it is, why don't you sign him? 
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS2LMwnxebk2zwcBWk4W7X...I8vWk4x3_g]
 [Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Move on from Whitworth if it means keeping Zeitler - Hoofhearted - 02-13-2017, 02:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)