02-15-2017, 12:12 PM
(02-15-2017, 11:24 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Breathe. No one is questioning your status as an expert on penis. After your dissertation I went back and reread the OP to make sure I didn't miss all those questions you asked. To my suprise he asked "why circumsize besides cosmetic". I gave reasons and provided a source. Yet somehow that triggered you to go off on a tangent.
You cited parents comb their child's hair and the AAP's policy as reasons while misunderstanding and misstating the AAP's policy.
The AAP's policy is to provide circumcision based upon the parent's religious, ethical, and cultural beliefs. The so called "tangent" is a direct response to you citing their policy while deliberately ignoring the AAP's policy caters to the parent's beliefs. Only you would think directly addressing the reasons given in a policy statement you cited is a tangent. F'n hilarious.
And as an expert, I know men usually don't get UTIs. If a man gets a single UTI during their lifetime you can chalk that up to extremely bad luck. A second UTI in a lifetime buys you a complete urological work up including a scope. So when it comes to circumcision reducing UTIs, it may reduce the chance of getting one UTI in your lifetime which you probably shouldn't get anyway.
