Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MOCK III
#5
(02-17-2017, 01:04 AM)Shady Wrote: I just have a hard time seeing any of the DE's who'll still be there at #9 (Barnett & Thomas) fitting our DE mold. Maybe the scouts and Marvin along with Tobin will view it otherwise, but I'd be shocked if they did. I can see an argument for either of them, plus arguments for Foster, Williams or Davis, and certainly for Hooker and maybe 1 or two other guys. For me it's a question about an automatic difference maker. Fournette might be gone by the time we get to pick in Round 1, but if he's there I think he's so significantly better than Hill, and would provide such an upgrade to our offense by making everyone better, provided we also upgrade our OLine, which I tried doing here without neglecting defensive needs, that I can't see not taking him. He's a power back with superior speed. 

Would Barnett and Thomas make that big of a difference in our pass rush? Maybe. Would Foster be an upgrade at LB? Yeah. But would any of those players make the difference that a truly elite RB would make? Fournette has that kind of ceiling. 

Marvin says time and time again, we are a running team. So yea we will do just the opposite, Stick with Hill and let Zeitler walk cause of course we keep our own and build through the draft.  Ninja
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
MOCK III - BURROWorBUST - 02-16-2017, 02:27 PM
RE: MOCK III - 3wt - 02-16-2017, 03:30 PM
RE: MOCK III - J24 - 02-17-2017, 12:40 AM
RE: MOCK III - BURROWorBUST - 02-17-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: MOCK III - TKUHL - 02-17-2017, 05:10 AM
RE: MOCK III - J24 - 02-17-2017, 04:35 PM
RE: MOCK III - rezolve11 - 02-17-2017, 11:11 AM
RE: MOCK III - Hammerstripes - 02-17-2017, 07:59 PM
RE: MOCK III - ochocincos - 02-17-2017, 12:29 PM
RE: MOCK III - psychdoctor - 02-20-2017, 10:36 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)