02-18-2017, 04:25 PM
Petraeus' security breech might have drawn criticism, sure. A lot of enlisted are angry that he got off so easy. But NSC advisor doesn't require anyone's ok but the president's. I
But both Petraeus and Harward backed off because they could not control the composition of the NSC staff. Imagine being forced to keep a Fox News Commentator on board! Much less Bannon.
Either one looked to be very competent--much more so than high-flying, reckless, conspiracy-theorist Flynn.
This is not the only position in which the talent is hanging back. Few want to alight their career stars with a Trump administration which will inevitably fail. No one wants to be in the position of Spicer, making statements that are outright lies because they are so ordered to.
But both Petraeus and Harward backed off because they could not control the composition of the NSC staff. Imagine being forced to keep a Fox News Commentator on board! Much less Bannon.
Either one looked to be very competent--much more so than high-flying, reckless, conspiracy-theorist Flynn.
This is not the only position in which the talent is hanging back. Few want to alight their career stars with a Trump administration which will inevitably fail. No one wants to be in the position of Spicer, making statements that are outright lies because they are so ordered to.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)