Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NFL.com "AJ McCarron a better trade target than Garoppolo?"
#36
(02-20-2017, 11:15 AM)Au165 Wrote: 3 in 30 years are not good enough odds to bank on. We aren't good enough to win right now with our starter, so a capable back up does 0 for us. You point to pittsburgh, but they didn't win so what does that mean? We beat Pittsburgh then lose to Denver instead (who already beat us with McCaron), still doesn't mean we get a SB. We need more pieces, that the back up can get us. If you wait until you can use the compensatory/tender pick your looking at a team a couple years older and further from their prime.

I simply think a back up QB on a team not good enough to win now is a wasted Luxury.

Exactly, and if people are worried about the number of picks we have we can always trade later round picks for future year picks. Or use them to move up in the draft. This team could definitely use an extra pick in the first 3 rounds though 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: NFL.com "AJ McCarron a better trade target than Garoppolo?" - leonardfan40 - 02-20-2017, 12:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)