02-22-2017, 04:44 PM
(02-22-2017, 09:48 AM)Au165 Wrote: He isn't "in" really anymore, but he does do "consulting" work for the military still. He doesn't deny the intelligence community can do a lot, or that they may have in history, he laughed at the thought that anyone in know would say you could actually charge a former POTUS with a crime, let alone treason.
All the more reason to discount the commentary in the article and to conduct a more fact based analysis of what the author of the article is getting at. Some happenings that I've found interesting:
In the past month we have heard a forced narrative of, "Russia hacked the election", despite WikiLeaks' adament claim that its info came from an internal leak as well as a complete lack of hard evidence. Wouldn't the intelligence community have been able to produce a traceroute if Russian state actors had actually hacked anything? If they have the traceroute, why hasn't it been made public?
Flynn's call was tapped and a summary leaked to the media, but the contents were never made public. Why hasn't the transcript been made public? Isn't it a bit strange for an intelligence agency to behave like this?
Four Russian diplomats have died in the past three months. One died in his bathroom of an unknown cause, two died of sudden heart attacks, and one was shot in the back in Turkey. A fifth died of blunt force trauma to the head in November of 2015.
Now we have Dennis Kucinich going on the record stating that there is a faction within the country that wants a new Cold War. I'm not a Trump supporter and I don't think all that highly of Putin, but I do find all of this a bit strange.
