Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules
#32
(02-24-2017, 02:45 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Gun Control is a perverse topic as you have the conservative fighting to ensure/expand the right and you have the liberal fighting to restrict the right. Given this is a generalization and no slight on anyone’s opinion as I’m sure you think yours is the right one. It is also one that I see myself siding more and more with the liberal.

I don’t think Congress should eliminate the arms you possess; however, there should be requirements for ownership. For instance:
Every adult citizen should be able to obtain a one trigger pull/ one round type weapon for home protection. Regardless if long barrel or short barrel.

If you want more than that (multiple weapons, exotic weapons, the ability to transport/carry, hunt) then licensing should be required.

Well, there goes the board's self-proclaimed "lone conservative voice."  Finally, the board is 100% liberal. Hillary thanks you for your assimilation. 





Messages In This Thread
RE: ‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 02-24-2017, 06:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)