Comp picks announced...

[Whatever]

(02-24-2017, 05:40 PM)jj22 Wrote: Yea because a player not good enough for one team is better than a player who has multiple teams after them as a free agent.

But lets keep not singing free agents to help us and go 6-9-1 so we can get that comp pick that doesn't even equate to an extra 3rd.

If your not getting a 3rd is it really even worth hurting the teams to try to salvage a  late round comp pick? That's the question.

One that we already know from years past will bust.

To be fair, a lot of those guys getting cut because they aren't good enough had multiple teams after them as a FA 2-3 years before they got cut, and they didn't perform up to expectations.

It's about finding the right guys, regardless of whet they come from the draft, high end free agents, the bargain bin, or the waiver wire.  Depth and having adequate starters has generally not been a problem.  Our issue is that we don't have enough superstar type players, which are insanely expensive to get in FA.  A big problem with that has been a steady string of underwhelming 1st and 2nd round picks(Dennard, Hill, Still, Hunt, Jackson, Kirkpatrick).