Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules
#38
(02-24-2017, 10:14 PM)Rotobeast Wrote:




BTW.... It penetrates too far for me to use for home defense.

Their maximum expansion round in the .300AAC subsonic is absolutely insane.  I've bought a fair amount of their product, the funny thing is I hope to never have to use the vast majority of it.  As for over penetration with that round, that assumes you hit no bone and that if it does over penetrate it doesn't hit a stud or the like.  Any shot in the eight circle or better, even some 7 ring hits, will not carry much risk of dangerous over penetration.  Contrast that with 00 buck, where your average gun owner, who doesn't even know what a choke is, will likely miss with two to three of the nine .33 caliber shot.  Way more danger of a stray shot in that scenario IMO.





Messages In This Thread
RE: ‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 02-24-2017, 11:36 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)